PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^IXIC vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^IXIC and ^SP500TR is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

^IXIC vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.09%
8.57%
^IXIC
^SP500TR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^IXIC:

1.61

^SP500TR:

2.05

Sortino Ratio

^IXIC:

2.15

^SP500TR:

2.73

Omega Ratio

^IXIC:

1.29

^SP500TR:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

^IXIC:

2.24

^SP500TR:

3.11

Martin Ratio

^IXIC:

8.08

^SP500TR:

12.99

Ulcer Index

^IXIC:

3.64%

^SP500TR:

2.03%

Daily Std Dev

^IXIC:

18.30%

^SP500TR:

12.86%

Max Drawdown

^IXIC:

-77.93%

^SP500TR:

-55.25%

Current Drawdown

^IXIC:

-4.14%

^SP500TR:

-2.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has outperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 15.39%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.45% annualized return.


^IXIC

YTD

0.14%

1M

-3.83%

6M

8.21%

1Y

30.17%

5Y*

15.60%

10Y*

15.39%

^SP500TR

YTD

1.00%

1M

-1.78%

6M

7.80%

1Y

27.02%

5Y*

14.09%

10Y*

13.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^IXIC vs. ^SP500TR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IXIC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^IXIC is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^SP500TR is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^SP500TR is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^IXIC vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.501.612.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.002.152.73
The chart of Omega ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.001.201.401.291.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.243.11
The chart of Martin ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 8.08, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.008.0812.99
^IXIC
^SP500TR

The current ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXIC and ^SP500TR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.61
2.05
^IXIC
^SP500TR

Drawdowns

^IXIC vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and ^SP500TR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.14%
-2.38%
^IXIC
^SP500TR

Volatility

^IXIC vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 4.97%. This indicates that ^IXIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.52%
4.97%
^IXIC
^SP500TR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab